<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jonathan Strange &amp; Mr. Norrell by Susanna Clarke</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.catholicfiction.net/2007/04/05/jonathan-strange-mr-norrell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.catholicfiction.net/2007/04/05/jonathan-strange-mr-norrell/</link>
	<description>news, views &#38; reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:00:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Debra Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.catholicfiction.net/2007/04/05/jonathan-strange-mr-norrell/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Debra Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 22:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catholicfiction.net/2007/04/05/jonathan-strange-mr-norrell/#comment-97</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m on my second reading of this (audio)book, and feel quite safe, I think, in predicting that  Neil Gaiman was quite right in identifying this book as the most important work of fantasy to be published in many decades, for my money since Tolkien&#039;s &lt;em&gt;The Lord of the Rings&lt;/em&gt;. In fact, I think Clarke may be pulling off (once we read the rest in the series) precisely what Tolkien set out to do: to create a mythology for England; especially since Tolkien, in fact, created a mythology for the West.

I hesitate to speculate, too, but there is a certain sense in which this book might be read almost as an allegory for that &quot;true&quot; Romanticism which longed for a return to the medieval ages/the Age of Faith, and yet was not afraid to recognize that this involved an embracing of a certain danger that ensues whenever one messes with &quot;more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in our philosophies.&quot; Of course, the fact is probably that those dangers, as Mr. Norrell learns, cannot be avoided anyway, no matter how much we seek to Bowdlerize and contain them. Magic will out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m on my second reading of this (audio)book, and feel quite safe, I think, in predicting that  Neil Gaiman was quite right in identifying this book as the most important work of fantasy to be published in many decades, for my money since Tolkien&#8217;s <em>The Lord of the Rings</em>. In fact, I think Clarke may be pulling off (once we read the rest in the series) precisely what Tolkien set out to do: to create a mythology for England; especially since Tolkien, in fact, created a mythology for the West.</p>
<p>I hesitate to speculate, too, but there is a certain sense in which this book might be read almost as an allegory for that &#8220;true&#8221; Romanticism which longed for a return to the medieval ages/the Age of Faith, and yet was not afraid to recognize that this involved an embracing of a certain danger that ensues whenever one messes with &#8220;more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in our philosophies.&#8221; Of course, the fact is probably that those dangers, as Mr. Norrell learns, cannot be avoided anyway, no matter how much we seek to Bowdlerize and contain them. Magic will out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

