<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: notes on criteria&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.catholicfiction.net/catholic-fiction-reading-list/notes-on-criteria/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.catholicfiction.net</link>
	<description>news, views &#38; reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:10:10 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: noradlf</title>
		<link>http://www.catholicfiction.net/catholic-fiction-reading-list/notes-on-criteria/comment-page-1/#comment-13707</link>
		<dc:creator>noradlf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catholicfiction.net/catholic-fiction-reading-list/notes-on-criteria/#comment-13707</guid>
		<description>Hi, Debra. 
I just subscribed the site and e-mail alert. 

May I suggest a book? 
It is the essay Women in the Days of Cathedrals
by Regine Pernoud, a French historian and medievalist. It shows what
was women condition back in that days (RP disliked Middle Ages been
called &#039;dark ages&#039;), when they were rulers in various manners and not
subject to men as they were in ancient times, thanks to Christianity. 
Women&#039;s conditions became dark after the Middle Ages, due to the return
to a classical-like thinking, that was definitely patriarchal. 

I also would like to say that Umberto Eco&#039;s books are not, in my
opinion, very &quot;serious&quot; about Catholicity and Christianity. I read them
both when I was an atheist and not at all partial for the Church: Foucault&#039;s Pendulum was boring, The name of the rose was not but it is a sort of a historical fraud, in spite of its scraps of documents, and its spirit is quite non-catholic. 
If you know Italian language, you can read here something about The name of the rose: http://www.storialibera.it/epoca_medioevale/articolo.php?id=134&amp;titolo=Contro%20%C2%ABIl%20nome%20della%20rosa%C2%BB. 

Bye, 
Umberta 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Debra.<br />
I just subscribed the site and e-mail alert. </p>
<p>May I suggest a book?<br />
It is the essay Women in the Days of Cathedrals<br />
by Regine Pernoud, a French historian and medievalist. It shows what<br />
was women condition back in that days (RP disliked Middle Ages been<br />
called &#8216;dark ages&#8217;), when they were rulers in various manners and not<br />
subject to men as they were in ancient times, thanks to Christianity.<br />
Women&#8217;s conditions became dark after the Middle Ages, due to the return<br />
to a classical-like thinking, that was definitely patriarchal. </p>
<p>I also would like to say that Umberto Eco&#8217;s books are not, in my<br />
opinion, very &#8220;serious&#8221; about Catholicity and Christianity. I read them<br />
both when I was an atheist and not at all partial for the Church: Foucault&#8217;s Pendulum was boring, The name of the rose was not but it is a sort of a historical fraud, in spite of its scraps of documents, and its spirit is quite non-catholic.<br />
If you know Italian language, you can read here something about The name of the rose: <a href="http://www.storialibera.it/epoca_medioevale/articolo.php?id=134&amp;titolo=Contro%20%C2%ABIl%20nome%20della%20rosa%C2%BB"  >http://www.storialibera.it/epoca_medioevale/articolo.php?id=134&amp;titolo=Contro%20%C2%ABIl%20nome%20della%20rosa%C2%BB</a>. </p>
<p>Bye,<br />
Umberta</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
