• PrintFriendly
  • Share/Bookmark

The Atlantic Monthly on “Flannery”

gooch_flanneryJoseph O’Neill, whose novel Netherland is this year’s recipient of the prestigious PEN/Faulkner Award, has written a piece on Flannery O’Connor for the recent issue of The Atlantic Monthly (using Brad Gooch’s biography, Flannery: A Life, as the occasion). O’Neill describes O’Connor’s writing as “unfairly” and “wickedly” good:

The narrating third person hovers in an almost miraculous fusion of proximity and comic distance. With O’Connor, there never seems to be space between the words and their creator’s sensibility. You almost never catch a whiff of authorial self-consciousness. About how many writers can this be said?

Nonetheless, O’Neill has problems with O’Connor the “exegesist.” In other words, O’Connor the Catholic:

To decode her fiction for its doctrinal or supernatural content is to render it dreary, even false, because whatever her private purposes, O’Connor was above all faithful to a baleful comic vision derived, surely, from an ancient, artistically wholesome tradition of misanthropy. Nonetheless, a spiritual drama is playing out. Only it is not the one put forward by the self-explaining author, in which she figures as an onlooker occupying the high ground of piety. On the contrary, Flannery O’Connor’s criticism reveals her as scarily belonging to the low world she evokes. She was touched by evil and no doubt knew it. That is what makes her so wickedly good.

O’Neill fears that reading O’Connor in light of her Catholicism reduces her artistic achievement, rendering it “dreary, even false.” This is common for current critics who find her writing rapturous, but her self-proclaimed “thirteenth century” Catholicism distasteful. Yet his own summation of O’Connor as nothing more than a deep-seated misanthropist, “belonging to the low world she evokes,” rather than a faithful Catholic looking into the heart of human mystery, strikes me as far drearier and less convincing than O’Connor’s own conviction that her faith was the driving force behind her art.

She wrote: “Because I am a Catholic I an afford to be nothing less than an artist.” O’Connor’s concentrated vision of the Fall is “baleful,” to be sure, but not without hope, as it would be in the work of a genuine misanthrope (Philip Roth, perhaps?). O’Connor’s stories feature characters unquestionably “touched by evil,” but O’Neill misses the larger point entirely. That they are also, and more importantly, “touched by grace.” That grace may be darkly comic, shocking, or violent, but it’s there. And it’s a mystery. O’Neill’s reading of O’Connor may reveal more about him than it does about his subject.

Deaf Sentence (2008) by David Lodge

Order from Amazon

reviewed by John Murphy

There is something appropriate about David Lodge writing on the ruefully comic trials and tribulations of deafness. He is a master chronicler of the seriocomic frustrations of daily life, whether it be the sexual frustrations of young Catholics post Vatican II in How Far Can You Go, or the family frustrations of a beleagured grad student juggling the demands of home life and academia in The British Museum is Falling Down. [Read more...]

On Chesil Beach (2007)

order from Amazon

by Ian McEwan

reviewed by John Murphy

Ian McEwan has built his reputation on elegant sentences describing horrific events: the abduction of a child, an out-of-control air balloon, an imagined rape, a break-in. In novels like Enduring Love, Atonement, and Saturday, these are personal calamities, domestic disasters, that burst lava-like from the dormancy of dailiness. On Chesil Beach seems at first like McEwan mellowing into a moderated naturalism, but soon there is no doubt that his version of a Wedding Night Gone Wrong belongs in his bulging file labeled “Humanity as Horrorshow.” [Read more...]

How Fiction Works by James Wood

buy from Powells Books

Order from Amazon

reviewed by John Murphy

How Fiction Works is a presuming title for a slim little book, made more conspicuous by a chapter called “A Brief History of Consciousness.” Oh, is that all? But the book’s author is James Wood, the New Yorker’s perspicacious literary critic, and his Preface quickly allays any fears of gassy pretension or self-importance. He writes that fiction is “both artifice and verisimilitude, and that there is nothing difficult in holding together these two possibilities.” It’s a deceptively simple thesis, and to prove it Wood picks examples from “the books at hand in my study,” like a wise man plucking fruit from the tree under which he sits.

Wood claims that “Novelists should thank Flaubert the way poets thank spring.” Gustave Flaubert, through works like Madame Bovary and A Sentimental Education, was the progenitor of the modern novelist: an ‘impartial,’ all-seeing eye acutely sensitivity to the significance of details. Flaubert wrote that “An author in his work must be like God in the universe, present everywhere and visible nowhere.” But which details to choose? Details cannot just accrete on the page like finger grease on a handrail. A writer, unlike our “aesthetically untalented” memories, must be selective. Wood borrows from Duns Scotus, a medieval theologian, the concept of ‘thisness’, a concreteness that lends details their correctness. He lauds the poet Gerard Manley Hopkins for the ‘thisness’ of his details: the ‘lovely behaviour’ of ‘silk-sack clouds’ in “Hurrahing in Harvest,” for example.

A detail weighted with ‘thisness’ becomes significant, perhaps symbolic. Literature is indexical, each symbol pointing to the greater truth that wraps around the glue-bound pages. Thus, Wood, concludes, the vitality of a literary character has less to do with action (or even plausibility) than with “a larger philosophical or metaphysical sense, our awareness that a character’s are deeply important, that something profound is at stake, with the author brooding over the face of that character like God over the face of the waters.”

Catholic fiction is particularly rich in this respect, since the author views his characters as souls with eternal rather than earthly fates. The drama of Sydney Carton in A Tale of Two Cities or the Whiskey Priest in The Power and the Glory has less to do with the question of whether they will live or die, than with whether they will live eternally. As Ron Hansen wrote, “Writing with faith is a form of praying. Evelyn Waugh maintained prayer ought to consist of adoration, contrition, thanksgiving, and supplication. And so it is in the writing of fiction, in which authors can adore God through their alertness to creation and to the Spirit that dwells in their talent; confess their own faults by faithfully recording the sins, failings, and tendencies of their characters; offer thanksgiving through the beauty of form, language, and thought in their creations; and beseech by obeying the rule of Saint Benedict which states: ‘Whatever good work you begin to do, beg of God with most earnest prayer to perfect it.’

Bad Behavior has blocked 482 access attempts in the last 7 days.

wordpress seo

copyright © 2007-2010 by Idylls Press.